End Use Monitoring Agreement (Euma)

All of these agreements contain a number of restrictive covenants. All three agreements were designed by the U.S. Congress to provide U.S. oversight, access and on-site inspection in the Netherlands — states that are under the U.S. nuclear and security parachute. Thus, there are now 32 countries under the nuclear and security parachute of the United States. The BECA would provide India with topographical and aeronautical data and products to support navigation and targeting. These are areas where the United States is very advanced and where the agreement could very well benefit India, although the armed forces that use systems from many other countries, such as Israel and Russia, are not used to sharing information about their systems with the United States. During the 2-2 meeting, the two countries also signed the Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (COMCASA). The agreement is one of three agreements considered “basic” for a viable India and the United States. military relations. In 2016, India and the United States signed the Memorandum of Understanding on the Exchange of Trust (LEMOA), which allowed its military to rebuild its bases.

The third, the Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement for Geographical Cooperation (BECA), has yet to be negotiated. It is necessary to take stock of the impact of these agreements on national security. While this argument is useful, given that the Indian comcasa is not a public document, we do not know the extent of the agreement. The government must therefore clarify several concerns. On the one hand, there is the issue of visits by U.S. inspectors to Indian bases to conduct inspections of the protected equipment comCASA sold to India. Earlier, on 4 August 2005, he told the Rajya Sabha: “Sir, what commitments have I made? I am very clear-headed and I can assure the House that there is no secret sticker or secret agreement. Everything I have talked about with the President (Bush) is said faithfully.

Our approval is no more than what is written in this joint statement. In 2009, the two sides signed a general agreement to flatten the process. This is not a formal agreement, but a specific agreement to India. EUMA and EEUMA remain important dealbreakers for India`s acquisition of U.S. equipment, as India cannot always allow the United States access to locations where weapons equipment or systems are located. What are you doing, for example, against air-to-air missiles at the scene? India may be close to signing several agreements that will strengthen its military relations with the United States. But before jumping on board, India must have a clear vision of why it is doing so. All these agreements are reciprocal. But only the bluntest analyst can ignore the fact that, in the last analysis, we are talking about a relationship, a partnership, if you will, between two very different countries: one country with a global military reach and another difficult to keep afloat in its own region.

Comments are closed.