Textile Agreement Wto

The provisions on textile and clothing commitments in all areas of the Uruguay cycle provide that all members take the necessary steps to comply with these rules and disciplines, in order to improve market access, ensure fair and fair trade conditions and avoid discrimination against imports of textiles and clothing (Article 7). When an exporting member is found to be not meeting its obligations, the dispute resolution body or the Goods Council may authorize an adjustment to quota growth for that country, which is otherwise automatic growth. 17. The administrative arrangements necessary for the implementation of this provision are agreed upon by the members concerned. These agreements are notified to the TMB. From 1974 to the end of the Uruguay Round, trade was governed by the Multifibre Agreement (AMF). It was a framework for bilateral agreements or unilateral measures to limit imports to countries whose domestic industry had suffered severe damage as a result of the rapid increase in imports. Products imported in each of the first three stages under GATT rules were to cover the four main types of textiles and clothing: yarns and yarns; Substances; Elaborate textile products; and clothes. All other restrictions that are not covered by the multifibre agreement and do not comply with the regular WTO agreements until 1996 were to be met or expire until 2005.

A textile watchdog (TMB) oversaw the implementation of the agreements. It consisted of a president and ten members who acted in their personal function. It followed the measures taken under the agreement to ensure their coherence and reported to the Goods Council, which reviewed the operation of the agreement before each new stage of the integration process. The textile watchdog also looked into disputes under the textile and clothing agreement. If left unresolved, disputes could be referred to the regular WTOs dispute resolution body. When the textile and clothing agreement expired on January 1, 2005, the textile monitoring office no longer existed either. 13. During the first stage of this agreement (from the effective date of the WTO agreement until the 36th month in which it is in force, including), the level of any restrictions under the bilateral MfAB agreements, in effect for the 12-month period prior to the entry into force of the WTO agreement , is increased each year by less than the growth rate set for these restrictions.

16%. (c) for wool products originating in developing wool countries, their economy and the textile and clothing trade depend on the wool sector, whose total exports of textiles and clothing are almost exclusively made up of wool and whose volume of textile and clothing sales is relatively low in the markets of importing members. , the export needs of these members are the subject of particular attention when considering the number of quotas. growth rate and flexibility; 3. If the 12-month period to be notified under paragraph 1 does not coincide with the 12-month period prior to the entry into force of the WTO agreement, the members concerned should agree on provisions to bring the time limit of the restrictions into line with the contractual year (2) and to define the notional principles of those restrictions in order to implement the provisions of this article.

Comments are closed.